Saturday, April 4, 2009


The G20 moves the world a step closer to a global currency The world is a step closer to a global currency, backed by a global central bank, running monetary policy for all humanity. By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard Last Updated: 2:06PM BST 03 Apr 2009

THE O'BOMB'A DECEPTION (high quality full length video)

Once again, I post this. CREDIT TO MARK SIMONS FOR THIS LINK. Full length (about 2 hours) video VERY GOOD QUALITY VIDEO

Friday, April 3, 2009


The Importance of Saving Money Season 13: Margaritaville Stan takes his $100 check and makes an investment into South Park Bank. Annndd it's gone. Go to the SOUTHPARK.COM website and find one of the most recent episodes where Stan deposits his $100 check in the bank. It just gets crazier by the second as the community likens Stan to Jesus as they all regress to togas and sandals as they stop spending due to lack of money. ABSOLUTELY HILARIOUS! Right now, you can only watch short clips of the show at the website, as the full version is not allowed to be shown on the internet until APRIL 25, 2009 FOR LEGAL REASONS. If you watch COMEDY CENTRAL, you may be lucky to find it still playing on cable this week before the next episode comes out. This episode MUST be watched in its entirety. You should tape it and save it for sharing with others.


Why Fearing the Police Is Not Irrational by Brian Cohoon There was a day in America when we, the people, had great respect for the police. When they would ask you how you are doing, they sincerely wanted to know because they cared. That day has passed with barely a whisper or complaint. Today when a cop (they prefer to be called Police Officers, as they feel "cop" is somewhat derogatory) asks you how you are, they are not doing it because they care but rather to set you at ease so you feel that their follow-up questions are friendly and benign. Since for most of us, our likely contact with the police is during a traffic stop (this is actually an arrest. If you do not believe this, try and leave the scene of the stop, or not stop in the first place), and the follow-up questions inevitably will be: Where are you coming from (sic)? Where are you going? What are you doing? Do you have anything illegal in your possession? What they are not doing is being friendly, but rather they are fishing for information to give them probable cause to search you and your vehicle. There are so many laws today that almost everyone is guilty of something at all times. It is unreasonable to think every individual will know every law for which they may be held accountable. We think "I'm not hurting anyone so I'm not doing anything wrong." While this seems reasonable to most of us (no victim, no crime right?), the law and especially the cops do not see it this way. Take this for example. You are heading home on a Saturday morning from your bank downtown, and get stopped by cops for some perceived infraction. You answer the questions above: "The bank downtown," "Home," "Nothing," "No." This seems perfectly reasonable and safe; you are just complying with the friendly police officer. What you do not know is that a different bank downtown was just robbed and you have given the cop probable cause to search you and your vehicle under suspicion that you are one of the robbers. Maybe this example hits closer to home. You are heading to your diabetic parents' home for a visit and are also going to deliver a box of 100 insulin syringes. You think nothing of it and mention the syringes to the police officer; clearly, you are only being friendly and answering the questions honestly. Well congratulations, if you live in Illinois you just admitted to a crime. Possession or transportation of more than 20 syringes by anyone not a health professional is a Class A misdemeanor for the first offense and a Class 4 felony after that. Welcome to the slammer and the humiliation of processing. Every single piece of information the cops need during a traffic stop is contained on your license, registration and proof of insurance. While there are a plethora of reasons why you should not even have to provide those (a huge topic all on its own), in my humble opinion the potential hassle of not complying far outweighs the benefits gained by attempting to circumvent these pieces of documentation. They have no reason to know neither where you have been nor where you are going. It is none of their business and has nothing to do with a traffic stop. So, do not tell them anything. Do not talk to them and do not even open your mouth. Remember they are not your friend. All they want is to find some reason to take you to the station and toss you in a cell, confiscate your vehicle (along with all the contents), put you in a situation that will cost you tens of thousands of dollars to get out of (if you are lucky) or a guilty plea-bargain to avoid jail time (congratulations on the felony record, no more guns for you and good luck finding a new job after you lost your current one during the 9 month legal battle). They will ruin your life if you give them the chance, just to advance their petty careers. And the final question with which you will be faced: "Do you have anything illegal in your possession?" How are you even supposed to know? Can any of us be sure that at any particular moment we are not committing some innocuous "crime"? I certainly do not know all the 70,000 pages of triple column, small font text released in the Federal Register every year let alone all the Local, County and State ordinances currently on the books for which I can be held accountable. So by them asking that question they have just set you up for a second charge on top of any others they can think up. "Obstructing an Officer" will tack on an extra 6 months of jail time to your sentence. Of course, the cops can lie to you all they want with impunity. Lastly comes the really scary part. How often have you heard of an on-duty cop who has done something horrible and then get prosecuted? The tasings, shootings, beatings and occasionally murders by the police go mostly unpunished. Sure, they might get two months of administrative leave (with pay) but nothing is really going to happen to them. They know this. They know that if you make them angry they could just pull you out of your car and beat you to the brink of death, and there is nothing anybody will do about it. The police care about only one thing: Compliance. Do what they say, when they say without question or you will suffer. They will see to that. The men and women so many people depend on to serve and protect them have become thugs whom we fear. And this fear is not irrational. April 3, 2009 Brian Cohoon [send him mail] is a software engineer working in Denver. Copyright © 2009 by Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Thursday, April 2, 2009


FROM CISCOKID This puts the current situation around the world in a very > understandable terms. > It all seems clearer now! > > > Linda is the proprietor of a bar in Cork . In order to increase sales, > she decides to allow her loyal customers - most of whom are unemployed > alcoholics - to drink now but pay later. > > She keeps track of the drinks consumed on a ledger (thereby granting > the customers loans). Word gets around and as a result increasing > numbers of customers flood into Linda's bar. Taking advantage of her > customers' > freedom from immediate payment constraints, Linda increases her prices > for wine and beer, the most-consumed beverages. Her sales volume > increases massively. > > A young and dynamic customer service consultant at the local bank > recognizes these customer debts as valuable future assets and > increases Linda's borrowing limit. He sees no reason for undue concern > since he has the debts of the alcoholics as collateral. At the bank's > corporate headquarters, expert bankers transform these customer assets > into DRINKBONDS, ALKBONDS and PUKEBONDS. These securities are then > traded on markets worldwide. > > No one really understands what these abbreviations mean and how the > securities are guaranteed. Nevertheless, as their prices continuously > climb, the securities become top-selling items. One day, although the > prices are still climbing, a risk manager (subsequently of course > fired due to his negativity) of the bank decides that slowly the time > has come to demand payment of the debts incurred by the drinkers at > Linda's bar. > > However they cannot pay back the debts. Linda can not fulfil her loan > obligations and claims bankruptcy. DRINKBOND and ALKBOND drop in price > by 95 %. PUKEBOND performs better, stabilizing in price after dropping by > 80 %. The suppliers of Linda's bar, having granted her generous > payment due dates and having invested in the securities are faced with a new situation. > Her wine supplier claims bankruptcy, her beer supplier is taken over > by a competitor. The bank is saved by the Government following > dramatic round-the-clock consultations by leaders from the governing > political parties (and vested interests).. The funds required for this purpose are obtained by a tax levied on the non-drinkers. > > > "There are two sides of a Balance Sheet, Left & Right (Assets and > Liabilities respectively): On the Right side there is nothing right > and on the Left side there is nothing left!!!" > ~ LEHMAN BROTHERS' ANALYST ~


Monsanto controls the seeds you grow if they are NOT HERITAGE SEEDS (seeds grown from seeds NOT controlled by Monsanto) Monsanto and the guv'mint want to be able to prevent you from growing your own food without them getting a piece of the action. All the seeds you buy in stores or on the internet are NOT HERITAGE SEEDS. There are a few websites that do sell them...Just GOOGLE...HERITAGE SEEDS. Here is a short video (bad sound) and other videos you can click on for more info on this subject. HERE IS A LINK FROM SORCHA FAAL'S website to obtain HERITAGE SEEDS. HERITAGE SEEDS ARE NOT CHEAP, BUT YOU CAN GROW SUCCESSIVE CROPS FROM THEM IF YOU SAVE THE PREVIOUS CROP'S SEEDS... AND.... THEY ARE NOT CONTROLLED BY MONSANTO OR ANYONE ELSE.


Wednesday, April 1, 2009



Monday, March 30, 2009


FROM "PROPHECY" (HIS USERNAME) In Germany, when Hitler came to power, it was a time of terrible financial depression. Money was worth nothing. In Germany people lost homes and jobs, just like in the American Depression in the 1930s, which we have read about in Thoene’s Shiloh books. In those days, in my homeland, Adolph Hitler was elected to power by promising ‘Change.’ He blamed the ‘Zionists’ around the world for all our problems. He told everyone it was greedy Zionist Bankers who had caused every problem we had. He promised when he was leader, the greedy Zionist bankers would be punished. The Zionists, he promised, would be wiped off the face of the earth. So Hitler was elected to power by only 1/3 the popular vote. A coalition of other political parties in parliament made him supreme leader. Then, when he was leader, he disgraced and expelled everyone in parliament who did not go along with him. Yes. Change came to my homeland as the new leader promised it would. The teachers in German schools began to teach the children to sing songs in praise of Hitler. This was the beginning of the Hitler Youth movement. It began with praise of the Fuhrer’s programs on the lips of innocent children. Hymns in praise of Hitler and his programs were being sung in the schoolrooms and in the play yard. Little girls and boys joined hands and sang these songs as they walked home from school. My brother came home and told Papa what was happening at school. The political hymns of children proclaimed Change was coming to our homeland and the Fuhrer was a leader we could trust. I will never forget my father’s face. Grief and fear. He knew that the best propaganda of the Nazis was song on the lips of little children. That evening before he said grace at the dinner table, he placed his hands upon the heads of my brothers and me and prayed the Living Word upon us from Jeremiah 1:4-5. ‘Now the Word of the Lord came to me, saying, ‘Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to The nations.’ Soon the children's songs praising the Fuhrer were heard everywhere on the streets and over the radio. ‘With our Fuhrer to lead us, we can do it! We can change the world!’ Soon after that Papa, a pastor, was turned away from visiting elderly parishioners in hospitals. The people he had come to bring comfort of God’s Word, were ‘no longer there.’ Where had they vanished to while under nationalized health care? It became an open secret. The elderly and sick began to disappear from hospitals feet first as ‘mercy killing’ became the policy. Children with disabilities and those who had Down syndrome were euthanized. People whispered, ‘Maybe it is better for them now. Put them out of misery. They are no longer suffering. And, of course, their death is better for the treasury of our nation. Our taxes no longer must be spent to care for such a burden.’ And so murder was called mercy. The government took over private business. Industry and health care were ‘nationalized.’ (NA-ZI means National Socialist Party) The businesses of all Jews were seized. (Perhaps you remember our story in Berlin on Krystalnacht in the book Munich Signature) The world and God’s word were turned upside down. Hitler promised the people economic Change?

Obama Lies-Senate Uses Sneak Attack On Guns (EMAIL 3/27/9)

Obama Lies-Senate Uses Sneak Attack On Guns As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama deliberately and repeatedly lied to America's 90 million gun owners across the country when he insisted that he would not try to take away anyone's firearms, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said. Now House Republicans are trying to add an amendment to the public lands "Ominous Spending" lands bill that would codify the right to carry concealed weapons in national parks, less than a week after a federal judge blocked a similar proposal. But, Senate leaders have devised a strategy to use a bill that had already passed the House -- H.R. 146, a proposal to protect Revolutionary War battlefields -- and strip its contents, replacing it with the "Ominous Spending" lands bill. Because the House already passed H.R. 146, the Rules Committee can approve a closed rule that would block a motion to recommit, eliminating the GOP's best procedural chance to stymie the bill. The chamber would only need a simple majority vote to concur with the Senate amendment. CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb, reacting to the "Ominous Spending" lands bill tactic to force more gun control on U.S. citizen's said "the sneak attack on guns reveals the Democrats clear intention to outlaw guns everywhere" "Obama "has been lying to the nation when he says he will not take guns away." U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly placed an injunction on the Interior rule last week. The judge's ruling infringed on the rights of gun owners as drivers in areas such as Washington, D.C., often drive through federal park lands every day. Rob Bishop (R-Utah) said "It's ridiculous for people to be subject to two different sets of regulations simply because their car moved a few feet," Bishop said in a statement. "The judge's decision last week was wrong." Select Here to Reject Gun Bans and Fax to all 100 Senators and all 435 House Representatives: URL: "We warned America that Obama's 'support' for the Second Amendment was empty rhetoric," he stated, "and now his support for the "Ominous Spending" lands bill shows Obama was lying, and now gun rights may be dying." "Right now," said Gottlieb, "I wouldn't take Obama's word if he said it rains a lot in Seattle. Apparently, law-abiding gun owners have nothing to fear unless they drive to work in Washington DC and park or drive in the wrong place." Select Here to Reject Gun Bans and Fax to all 100 Senators and all 435 House Representatives In order to stop Obama and his fellow Democrat gun-grabbers-we need to let the Congress know with thousands of faxes telling them to leave guns alone. Americans like you who understand what our Founding Fathers envisioned for our nation…and who are willing to fight to defend our Constitution and for what it stands. So please, help the Citizens Committee and me defeat those who wish to gut and trash the United States Constitution. Help me flood the U.S. Senate and the House with the sea of FAXES big enough to drown each and every Senator and Representative willing to vote away the Second Amendment. Please, send your Donation and FAX TODAY! Select Here to Reject Gun Bans and Fax to all 100 Senators and all 435 House Representatives Keep calling your Senators and Congressmen today, toll free numbers include 1-877-851-6437 and 1-866-220-0044, or call toll 1-202-225-3121 AND REGISTER YOU'RE OUTRAGE at ongoing efforts to take guns away! CALL PRESIDENT OBAMA, 202-456-1111 and 202-456-1414 expressing your disdain and ABSOLUTE REJECTION of all GUN BANS. DO NOT BE SILENCED – MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD! NOTE: We need TENS OF THOUSANDS of faxes and PHONE CALLS and EMAILS delivered to ALL Senators and Representatives right away! For our projects to be successful, we must count on the voluntary financial support from individuals like you who care. Your contribution of $20 or $25 is urgently needed today. Your donation for just $10 will help so much. If you can afford to send $50 or $100 or more it would truly be a godsend. Remember, protecting our freedom is not inexpensive. But then, it's impossible to put a price tag on freedom. Select Here NOW Send Your Most Generous CCRKBA Donation Together, we can preserve the Constitutional rights our Founding Fathers intended our people to have forever. For more information about CCRKBA go to Thank you. I know I can count on you. Sincerely, Alan Gottlieb Chairman Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms If you prefer to donate by check, please mail to: The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms 12500 NE Tenth Place Dept Code 2202 Bellevue, Washington 98004


CREDIT TO GOLDMELTER FOR THIS INFO. The Gun Ban list is out: Here it is folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you own. Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It has happened in the UK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did. Please send this to everyone you can. It will come up for a vote, and it might even be a secret vote if Madame Pelosi has her way, and then it will be a done deal. ...thanks to Colonel Rus. Hal Right to own a gun: Remember... The first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the citizens. Get ready America!!! Gun-ban list proposed. Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress) It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady's plan to introduce shortly. I have an outline of the Brady's current plans and targets of opportunity, It's horrific. They're going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. They've made little mention of criminals. Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact our freedoms under search and seizure, due process, confiscated property, states' rights, free speech, right to assemble and more, in addition to the Second Amendment. The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse): Rifles (or copies or duplicates): M1 Carbine, Sturm Ruger Mini-14, AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15, AR-10, Thompson 1927, Thompson M1; AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM, MAK90, NHM 90, NHM 91, SA 85, SA 93, VEPR; Olympic Arms PCR; AR70, Calico Liberty , Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU, Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR, or FNC, Hi-Point20Carbine, HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, HK-PSG-1, Thompson 1927 Commando, Kel-Tec Sub Rifle; Saiga, SAR-8, SAR-4800, SKS with detachable magazine, SLG 95, SLR 95 or 96, Steyr AU, Tavor, Uzi, Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle ( Galatz ). Pistols (or copies or duplicates): Calico M-110, MAC-10, MAC-11, or MPA3, Olympic Arms OA, TEC-9, TEC-DC9, TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10, Uzi. Shotguns (or copies or duplicates): Armscor 30 BG, SPAS 12 or LAW 12, Striker 12, Streetsweeper. Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs): A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has: (i) a folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below), (iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud. Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles). A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and has: (i) a second pistol grip, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a barrel shroud or (iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and (v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds. A semiautomatic shotgun with: (i) a folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a pistol grip (see definition below), (iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and (iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder. Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits. Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will: Under the proposal, the US Attorney General can add any "semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General." Note that Obama's pick for this office, Eric Holder, wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you have no right to have a working firearm in your own home. In making this determination, the bill says, "there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event." In plain English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or the military is not suitable for the public. The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn't have a sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose -- is that devious or what? And of course, "sporting purpose" is a rights infringement with no constitutional or historical support whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent. Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America Forward or send to every gun owner you know... VIDEO TO WATCH: CNN- Obama To BAN Guns

Sunday, March 29, 2009


GT sez: Be sure to understand all the terminology you have heard and used during your lifetime...It's going to become important very soon to use it properly as we soon begin to discover just who is a traitor to our country in the creation of this economic disaster.... "In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more serious acts of disloyalty to one's sovereign or nation. Historically, treason also covered the murder of specific social superiors, such as the murder of a husband by his wife (treason against the king was known as high treason and treason against a lesser superior was petit treason). A person who commits treason is known in law as a traitor. Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour." READ MORE AT:


Top Constitutional Scholar: Secret Bush Memos Reveal Plan For “Massive Military Takeover Of US” AND THIS... Terror Memos Reveal Total Destruction Of U.S. Constitutional Freedoms No official reversal, illegal practices can continue Steve Watson Tuesday, March 3, 2009 HERE ARE THE NINE MEMOS:


March 29, 2009 Obama Gets Massive New Law To Force All Americans Into Cities By: Sorcha Faal


THESE PEOPLE HAVE NEVER BEEN WRONG YET IN PREDICTING WHEN THINGS WILL HAPPEN. VERY OMINOUS PREDICTION FOR THE NEAR FUTURE. THIS IS A MUST READ!!-Growing-Transatlantic-tensions-on-the-eve-of-the-G20-summit-An-illustration-of-Wall-Street-s-and_a2940.html?PHPSESSID=7f96eb38796490220a969131e624599e